🍁 Will Canada Be Leading the World in the 'Aerosol' Vaccine Industry?
Let's see what Grok has to say about this....
I’ve been seeing posts tho this effect, here’s just a paragraph of one I recently saw: “The Canadian government has begun ramping up testing for a chilling new Covid mRNA “AeroVax” that seeks to overcome “vaccine hesitancy” by using aerosols to “vaccinate” the general public. Unlike traditional “vaccines” that are deployed using injections, the new AeroVax is an atomized spray that is inhaled. The new “vaccines” are sprayed in aerosol form and breathed in by recipients. The AeroVax was developed by researchers at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation-funded McMaster University in Canada.
📌 Here’s What Grok (X ai) Had to Say (Grok needs to be trained to be more UNbiased):
The claim that the Canadian government is testing an inhaled mRNA COVID vaccine called “AeroVax” to overcome “vaccine hesitancy” by using aerosols to “vaccinate” the general public contains some accurate elements but is heavily sensationalized and includes misleading or unverified assertions. Let’s break it down based on available information:
AeroVax and Testing: The AeroVax Inhaled COVID Vaccine Trial is a real Phase 2 clinical trial conducted by McMaster University, funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) with $8 million. It is testing an inhaled, adenovirus-based vaccine called ChAd-TriCoV/Mac, not an mRNA vaccine as the claim suggests. The vaccine targets three SARS-CoV-2 proteins to enhance immune responses, particularly in the lungs and upper airways, and is intended for people who have received at least three doses of an mRNA COVID vaccine. The trial aims to enroll 350 participants across Hamilton, Ottawa, and Halifax to evaluate safety and immunogenicity. Phase 1 trials with 36 participants showed no severe side effects and promising immune responses.
mRNA Mischaracterization: The claim incorrectly labels AeroVax as an mRNA vaccine. Official sources, including McMaster University and the AeroVax trial website, confirm it is an adenovirus-vectored vaccine, using a modified adenovirus to deliver COVID-19 antigens, not mRNA technology. This is a significant factual error in the claim.
Overcoming Vaccine Hesitancy: The claim that AeroVax “seeks to overcome vaccine hesitancy” by using aerosols is speculative and not directly supported by primary sources. The AeroVax trial’s stated goal is to develop a needle-free vaccine that targets mucosal immunity in the lungs, potentially improving efficacy against respiratory viruses and reducing barriers like needle phobia. While this could indirectly appeal to those hesitant about injections, there’s no evidence from the trial’s documentation or McMaster University that the vaccine is designed to “vaccinate the general public” without consent or to specifically target vaccine hesitancy.
Aerosol Vaccination and Consent Concerns: The suggestion that AeroVax could be “deployed atmospherically” to vaccinate entire populations without consent is a major point of contention in the claim. Some sources, like Slay News and Technocracy News, raise this as a hypothetical concern, citing the vaccine’s aerosol delivery and self-amplifying technology. However, the AeroVax trial explicitly involves voluntary participants using a nebulizer (similar to asthma inhalers) in a controlled clinical setting, with informed consent and ethical oversight by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (HiREB) and Health Canada. There’s no evidence in trial protocols or official statements suggesting atmospheric dispersal or non-consensual vaccination. Such claims appear to stem from speculation or misinterpretation of the vaccine’s delivery method.
Ethical and Safety Considerations: The claim mentions the use of HEK293 fetal cell lines, which is accurate—McMaster’s research confirms the vaccine was developed using these cells, derived from a 1970s aborted fetus. This has raised ethical concerns in some circles, as noted in sources like LifeSiteNews. However, the use of HEK293 cells is common in vaccine development and not unique to AeroVax. Pre-clinical trials in animals showed stronger immune responses compared to injections, but human trials are still ongoing, and long-term safety data is not yet available. The claim’s description of AeroVax as “chilling” amplifies fear without evidence of harm beyond standard trial risks.
👉 My Next Question: “Is it possible to add aerosol vaccines to chemtrails? Keep in mind chemtrails are real and big pharma and globalists do wish to harm us.
Grok: The claim that AeroVax was developed by researchers at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation-funded McMaster University in Canada is partially accurate but requires clarification to avoid misleading implications. Here’s the breakdown:
AeroVax Development at McMaster University: AeroVax, specifically the ChAd-TriCoV/Mac inhaled vaccine, was indeed developed by researchers at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The vaccine is part of a Phase 2 clinical trial funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) with $8 million, as confirmed by McMaster University’s official statements and the AeroVax trial website. The research is led by experts like Fiona Smaill and Brian Lichty, focusing on an adenovirus-vectored vaccine targeting SARS-CoV-2.
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Funding: There is no direct evidence from primary sources, such as McMaster University, CIHR, or the AeroVax trial documentation, confirming that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation specifically funded the development of AeroVax. However, McMaster University has received funding from the Gates Foundation for various global health and infectious disease research projects in the past. For example, the Gates Foundation has supported McMaster’s work on vaccine development and health initiatives, as noted in university reports and global health funding databases. It’s plausible that some infrastructure or expertise at McMaster’s Centre for Emerging and Pandemic Infectious Diseases, where AeroVax is being developed, may have indirectly benefited from such funding. However, the claim’s framing suggests a direct link between the Gates Foundation and AeroVax, which lacks substantiation in available records.
Context and Implications: The claim’s association with the Gates Foundation often appears in sources like Slay News or X posts (e.g., from users like @FinalTelegraph to imply ulterior motives, given the Foundation’s controversial reputation in some circles. However, no primary evidence ties AeroVax’s funding or development explicitly to the Gates Foundation. The trial’s primary funding is from CIHR, a Canadian government agency, and the research adheres to standard ethical and regulatory oversight by Health Canada and the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (HiREB).
Conclusion: The Canadian government, via CIHR, is funding Phase 2 trials for AeroVax, an inhaled adenovirus-based (not mRNA) vaccine developed by McMaster University. The trial is voluntary, controlled, and aimed at evaluating safety and immune responses, not bypassing consent or targeting vaccine hesitancy through atmospheric dispersal. Claims about mass vaccination without consent are speculative and unsupported by evidence. The sensationalized framing and mislabeling of the vaccine as mRNA exaggerate the situation, likely to stoke fear. Always cross-check such claims with primary sources like trial websites or university statements.AeroVax was developed by researchers at McMaster University, but the claim that it was directly funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is not supported by primary sources. While McMaster has received Gates Foundation funding for other projects, no evidence confirms a direct link to AeroVax. The claim risks exaggerating or misrepresenting the funding context. Verify such claims with primary sources like McMaster University’s research announcements or CIHR funding records.
🎞️ Covid Vaccine Videos on My Rumble Channel
☠️ NOTE: My own personal fear is they would add vaccines to chemtrails, agricultural sprays, etc. Depopulation is real - they either want us sick $$ or dead - or both.
🟣 Dr. William Makis’ Cancer Treatment Success Testimonials: www.DrMakisHealth.com
🟣 Alternative Health Blog
🟣 MasterPeace Nutraceutical With Zeolite Removes Graphene, Heavy Metals, Plastics
🟣 Dr. Ardis's Amazing Health Supplements, Parasite Detox and Health Protocols
🟣 Organic CBD Oil For Humans and Pets
🟣 Wellness Emergency Kits Contain Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine and More
🟣 The Joe Tippens Cancer Protocol 🎗️ Fenbendazole/Ivermectin For Cancer Treatment
🟣 Fenbendazole and Ivermectin to Treat/Cure Cancer
🟣 Organic Vitamin B17/Apricot Seeds/Laetrile/Amygdalin Products For Cancer
🟣 Chlorine Dioxide (MMS) Mouthwash, Toothpaste, Nasal Spray and Water Drops
🟣 Chlorine Dioxide (MMS) Drops For Drinking Water
🟣 BodyAlign EMF Protection For Humans and PetsMy personal fear is that they (globlists/BigPharma, etc) would add vaccines to chemtrails, agricultural sprays, etc. Depopulation is real - they want us sick and/or dead.
I wouldn't put it past them....
You'd have to be insane to take this after the last 5 years of results of the mRNA-based jab. If they drop this from a plane 😤 They need to be dropped from the same plane without a parachute!