The Killshots Masqueraded as ‘Vaccines’ With the Ability to Shed, Cause Cancer and Kill
Here Are The Receipts and Proof
Source: Thomas Renz, Esq
I have been talking a fair bit about the intersection between the COVID vaccines, cancer, and shedding. Each time I do so, the community notes crooks on Twitter, and fact checkers lie about it, so I brought the receipts. I have zero doubt the fake “fact-checkers” will try and lie about this but I challenge you to actually read the article and show me it is unfounded. The reality is that there are legitimate concerns to be had about the vaccines, cancer, and shedding. Further, there is ZERO question that these jabs absolutely ARE gene therapies.
Recently, I found myself down a rabbit hole of FDA documents, and holy smokes, guys – what I found is a real barn burner. I’m going to try and keep this as brief as possible so that the gravity of what I’m about to share isn’t lost in too many details. In my opinion, what I’ve discovered is nothing less than premeditated murder.
It’s crazy to even say that, but there’s no other conclusion that I can draw after reviewing these FDA ‘Guidance for Industry’ documents, published years before the Covid fiasco. This is the smoking gun evidence that proves they knew that the gene therapy products they masqueraded as ‘vaccines’ had the ability to shed, cause cancer, and kill.
It’s Gene Therapy – Not a Vaccine.
It’s critical that people understand that the Covid-19 injections are gene therapy. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention currently defines a “vaccine” as a preparation used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases. However, that definition changed in 2021 because it didn’t apply to the COVID-19 vaccines. A vaccine must contain an antigen to trigger the body’s natural immune response. Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA vaccines do not contain antigens. The active substance used to elicit an immune response in these vaccines is the mRNA—a form of nucleic acid and the genetic material of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that provides instructions to the body for producing antigens—spike proteins (actually, it is modRNA – see my previous posts – and also contaminated with DNA).
Moreso, Moderna and Pfizer’s own SEC filings admit that they are gene therapy products. On pages 148 & 149 of Moderna’s 2019 SEC filing, there is a legally mandated discussion of “risk factors” that reads as follows:
“No mRNA drug has been approved in this new potential class of medicines and may never be approved as a result of efforts by others or us. mRNA drug development has substantial clinical development and regulatory risk due to the novel and unprecedented nature of this new class of medicines.
As a potential new class of medicines, no mRNA medicines have been approved to date by the FDA or other regulatory agency… currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA.”
In March 2015, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the FDA, and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research published a ‘guide for industry’ entitled: “Determining the Need for and Content of Environmental Assessments for Gene Therapies, Vectored Vaccines, and Related Recombinant Viral or Microbial Products” from which I pulled the following definition of ‘gene therapy’:
Gene therapies are defined in the FDA guidance document entitled, “Gene Therapy Clinical Trials – Observing Subjects for Delayed Adverse Events” dated November 2006 as “[p]roducts that mediate their effects by transcription and/or translation of transferred genetic material and/or by integrating into the host genome and that are administered as nucleic acids, viruses, or genetically engineered microorganisms. The products may be used to modify cells in vivo or transferred to cells ex vivo prior to administration to the recipient.”
It defines gene therapies as “products that mediate their effects by transcription and/or translation of transferred genetic material and/or by integrating into the host genome and that are administered as nucleic acids, viruses or genetically engineered microorganisms. The products may be used to modify cells in vivo or transferred to cells ex vivo prior to administration to the recipient.”
“For purposes of this guidance, a vectored vaccine is one that uses a virus or microbe (typically a bacterium), or a DNA plasmid to introduce DNA/RNA encoding for antigens to cells of the body. “Vector” refers to the virus microbe or DNA plasmid used as the carrier.”
So, what does that mean in English? It means the Covid vaccines are gene products.
Listen to the podcast on this crucial topic: Bringing the receipts: cancer, shedding, and gene therapy vaccines
Shedding: They Knew It Was Possible
We were called ‘conspiracy theorists’ and gaslit and censored when we warned about shedding and questioned why unvaccinated females were bleeding abnormally after being exposed to the jabbed. These documents prove they knew these products could shed and harm those who never consented to gene therapy.
In August 2015, they published “Design and Analysis of Shedding Studies for Virus or Bacteria-Based Gene Therapy and Oncolytic Products,” in which they admit that these gene therapy products can shed in multiple ways.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER)/Office of Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies (OCTGT) is issuing this guidance to provide you, sponsors of virus or bacteria-based gene therapy products (VBGT products)1 and oncolytic viruses or bacteria (oncolytic products)2 with recommendations on how to conduct shedding studies during preclinical and clinical development. For purposes of this guidance, the term “shedding” means release of VBGT or oncolytic products from the patient through one or all of the following ways: excreta (feces); secreta (urine, saliva, nasopharyngeal fluids etc.); or through the skin (pustules, sores, wounds). Shedding is distinct from biodistribution because the latter describes how a product is spread within the patient’s body from the site of administration while the former describes how it is excreted or released from the patient’s body. Shedding raises the possibility of transmission of VBGT or oncolytic products3 from treated to untreated individuals (e.g., close contacts and health care professionals). This guidance represents FDA’s current thinking on how and when shedding data should be collected for VBGT and oncolytic products during preclinical…
Clear as day, it indicates the term ‘shedding’ means “release of VBGT or oncolytic products from the patient through one or all of the following ways: excreta (feces) secreta (urine, saliva, nasopharyngeal fluids, etc.) or through the skin (pustules, sores, wounds).”
The document goes on to reveal they identified safety risks to untreated (unvaccinated) individuals from these products.
“Shedding raises the possibility of transmission of VBGT or oncolytic products from treated to untreated individuals (e.g., close contacts and health care professionals).”
“The possibility that the shed VBGT or on an oncolytic product may be infectious raises safety concerns related to the risk of transmission to untreated individuals.”
XI. ASSESSING THE POTENTIAL FOR TRANSMISSION TO UNTREATED INDIVIDUALS DUE TO SHEDDING
Our current understanding is that in most cases, the potential for transmission to untreated individuals is extremely low when VBGT or oncolytic products are shed because of the derivation methods and/or modifications that are designed to attenuate the product when compared to the parent strain of virus or bacterium. Nevertheless, you should discuss the potential for transmission based on the analysis of the shedding data collected in the clinical studies and taking into consideration the factors described below.
They knew about the potential for this to transfer (shed) from those injected with the COVID-19 gene therapy product to those who did not consent. They identified multiple vectors in which a non-consenting person could be affected and harmed through the body fluid or excretions of a treated person. This is an open admission and a clear violation of the Nuremberg Code’s first principle of voluntary consent.
Cancer & Delayed Adverse Events
I wish I could tell you that’s the worst of it, but there’s more. They knew these gene therapy products could cause cancer, even years after injection. The November 2006 publication of “Gene Therapy Clinical Trials: Observing Subjects for Delayed Adverse Events” revealed the following:
II. BACKGROUND
A. Potential Risks of Delayed Adverse Events Following Exposure to Gene Transfer Technology
Study subjects exposed to gene transfer technology may be at risk of delayed adverse events as a consequence of persistent biological activity of the genetic material or other components of the products used to carry the genetic material. The persistent biological activity may be necessary for the product to provide a continuing clinical benefit. However, persistent biological activity could have adverse effects upon normal cell function, placing subjects at risk for development of adverse events, some of which may be delayed by months or years.
Factors likely to increase the risk of delayed adverse events following exposure to gene transfer technology include persistence of the viral vector, integration of genetic material into the host genome, prolonged expression of the transgene, and altered expression of the host’s genes. Persistence of the viral vector, sometimes associated with latency, could permit continued expression of the gene or delayed effects of viral infection. Integration of genetic material from a viral vector into the host cell genomic DNA raises the risk of malignant transformation (see Section V.F for a discussion of risks of malignancy associated with retroviral vectors). Prolonged expression of the transgene may also be associated with long-term risks resulting from unregulated cell growth and malignant transformation, autoimmune-like reaction to self antigens, and unpredictable adverse events. Altered expression of the host genes could also result in unpredictable and undesirable biologic events.
This document warns that these gene therapy products carry the risk of adverse effects on normal cell function and could delay adverse events for months or even years. Even more alarming is the disclaimer about the ‘integration of genetic material into the host genome’ and ‘altered expression’ of the host’s genes. The fact-checkers will tell you until they’re blue in the face that the jabs do not affect or change your DNA, and clearly, that is false.
A 2023 study analyzed the cellular DNA of humans suffering from Long Covid. The authors found genes uniquely specific to the Pfizer COVID BNT162b2 vaccine in those human blood cells. Their findings prove that mRNA COVID vaccines permanently integrate into the DNA of some COVID-vaccinated people.
Simply put, the regulatory agencies knew that these products could integrate into the host genome and cause cancer (malignant transformation), autoimmune disorders, and adverse events years after the fact. Also, consider that even when these products do not integrate into the genome, the continual exposure due to the shedding (discussed above) may increase the risk of cancer.
B. Previous FDA Recommendations
We previously issued a guidance related to retroviral vector-mediated gene therapy (Ref. 1). We considered retroviruses to carry the highest known risk because of a reported case of new malignancy associated with a preclinical gene therapy study following exposure to cells transduced by a retroviral vector (Ref. 2), and therefore included in that guidance specific recommendations on performing long-term observations of subjects in trials of retroviral-mediated gene therapies.
In 2021 I said that in 3-5 years, we were going to see the true extent of the damage from the Covid vaccines. What are we seeing now? Turbo cancers and an onslaught of ‘died suddenly’ headlines amongst the otherwise young and healthy. Oncologists are reporting an alarming increase in aggressive, fast-growing cancers that don’t respond to the normal treatment protocols.
The Panic & The Pill: Sold by the Same People
These jabs were designed as killing machines and were distributed knowing that they would shed and kill people. They created a gene therapy product, marketed it as a ‘vaccine,’ then schemed, coerced, bribed, and lied to get it into as many arms as possible.
The Hegelian Dialectic ‘problem, reaction, solution’ is at play here. They knew it could cause cancer – years after injection and now that there is an epidemic of cancer, amazingly, they have a ‘solution’ ready to go.
Gene therapy for cancer: regulatory considerations for approval
SR Husain , J Han, P Au, K Shannon & R K Puri
Cancer Gene Therapy 22, 554-563 (2015) | Cite this article 22k Accesses 74 Citations 9 Altmetric Metrics
Abstract
The rapidly changing field of gene therapy promises a number of innovative treatments for cancer patients. Advances in genetic modification of cancer and immune cells and the use of oncolytic viruses and bacteria have led to numerous clinical trials for cancer therapy, with several progressing to late-stage product development. At the time of this writing, no gene therapy product has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Some of the key scientific and regulatory issues include understanding of gene transfer vector biology, safety of vectors in vitro and in animal models, optimum gene transfer, long-term persistence or integration in the host, shedding of a virus and ability to maintain transgene expression in vivo for a desired period of time. Because of the biological complexity of these products, the FDA encourages a flexible, data-driven approach for preclinical safety testing programs. The clinical trial design should be based on the unique features of gene therapy products, and should ensure the safety of enrolled subjects. This article focuses on regulatory considerations for gene therapy product development and also discusses guidance documents that have been published by the FDA.
And guess what? Their ‘solution’ is another gene therapy product that sheds!
CGT products present the possibility of viral or bacterial shedding, that is, excretion/secretion of viral particles or bacteria that could be transmitted to other individuals. Although product-based viruses and bacteria may not be as infectious or as virulent as the parent strain of a virus or bacterium, the possibility of transmission raises safety concerns. An analysis of data collected from patients in clinical gene therapy trials demonstrated that shedding of viral vectors occurs in practice, and is mainly determined by the type of vector and the route of vector administration 36 A qualitative model presented in the study can help to determine the risk of shedding occurring via the different excretion routes. 37
This is beyond a lack of informed consent, folks. This shows a conspiracy. This is a RICO action that should be filed.
Listen to the podcast on this crucial topic: Bringing the receipts: cancer, shedding, and gene therapy vaccines
Related:
👉 Steve Kirsch Speaks To Members Of The U.K. Parliament About The Dangers Of COVID Vaccines
👉 Dr. David Martin Exposes Timeline of Biggest Democide in Recorded History in the EU Parliament
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fec252d6d-c5c1-4504-a36d-31376f41d499_1024x874.png)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fabf4be84-dc74-4b11-8c1e-86388df06fa4_1024x458.jpeg)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fe66256d5-3901-4948-a6cf-4f453d7c43c6_816x759.jpeg)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F17e5d763-0f85-4f33-9dee-05483c9556e1_777x759.png)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fddd8de79-2114-4a3f-852d-2721d92d8396_1024x576.jpeg)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ff5346e37-6864-420c-b720-9e5b94866aa1_500x500.png)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fe8166af0-cb6d-4b84-96bf-307d5e6a09a5_957x593.jpeg)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F82a6626d-8f7b-4d1c-8f03-327998e0465e_445x288.jpeg)
🛑 My Covid Vaccine Detox Remedies and Protocols Website: www.DiamondzDetox.com
🛑 WAVwatch Frequency Healing For Pain, Inflammation, Arthritis, Anxiety, Colds & Flu, Headaches and More: https://tinyurl.com/2auhz27p
🛑 Order Ivermectin – Hydroxychloroqine – Azithromycin (Z-Pack), Budesonide and Other Meds Online: www.BodywisePharmacy.com
🛑 Order Fenbendazole Here: FenBen Labs
🛑 Dr. Zev Zelenko’s Products Include “Z-Detox” For Covid Vaccine Protection – “Z-Flu” Protection Against Colds and Flu and “Z-Shield” which helps defend against dormant viruses. All Products Can Be Found Here: https://tinyurl.com/yc8zhusw
🛑 “Clean Slate” by ROOT Brands Provides a Full Body Detox Cleanse and Healing From Damage Caused By the Covid Vaccine Ingredients:
https://therootbrands.com/bodywisecbd
ROOT Brands CEO Christina Rahm Explains Her Incredible Products in This Video: https://tinyurl.com/bddyekfu.
🛑 High Grade Zeolite for Detox: https://tinyurl.com/53uxv89j
🛑 Chlorine Dioxide (MMS): https://tinyurl.com/43kdtmr3
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F1b9cd243-59fc-4b48-bb85-a5dc27531396_1024x240.jpeg)